TV inspection plays a crucial role in many industries, from monitoring underground infrastructure to inspecting industrial ducts and assessing installations in confined spaces.
The use of drones for confined-area inspections has become an indispensable solution in many industries, whether for tunnels, ducts, or other industrial spaces that are difficult to access. However, a common question remains: how far can a flying drone travel in these confined environments? This article explores the various factors influencing the distance covered, as well as solutions for optimizing drone performance in these complex environments.
In the industrial world, maintenance plays a crucial role in guaranteeing the reliability, safety and performance of installations. As infrastructures become increasingly complex, particularly in the energy sector, companies are constantly seeking to adopt innovative technologies to meet the challenges of inspection and maintenance.
Industrial chimneys, emblematic structures of industrial installations, play a key role in the evacuation of fumes and gases. Regular inspection is essential to ensure that they function properly, and to prevent risks such as wear, cracks and blockages. However, these inspections are often complex due to their height, difficult access and restrictive indoor conditions. Fortunately, indoor drones, such as Multinnov's Stereo2, offer an innovative and effective solution to these challenges. But how high can they operate?
Televisual inspection (TVI) has become an indispensable method in many industrial sectors. Whether for monitoring critical infrastructures, checking equipment status or preventing incidents, this technology offers greater precision and safety than traditional methods. With tools like the ITV robot, professionals can access hard-to-reach areas while limiting the risks to their teams. The Roview2, developed by Multinnov, is an excellent example of innovation in this field, combining efficiency, robustness and cutting-edge technology.
Faced with increasingly complex inspection requirements, companies are often faced with a dilemma: whether to opt for the human expertise of a rope access technician or the technological precision of a drone. Each method has its own advantages and limitations, and the choice depends on a number of criteria such as the type of intervention, budget or environmental constraints. This article compares these two approaches to help you choose the one that best suits your project.